gracerene (
gracerene
) wrote
in
snowgall
2015-05-18 02:37 pm (UTC)
no subject
So interesting! I'd def be down for another round. ;)
Hmm, 2010 is surprising with the more bottom!harry, but other than that, the data seems fairly aligned with what I'd already thought. :D
(
29 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Hmm, 2010 is surprising with the more bottom!harry, but other than that, the data seems fairly aligned with what I'd already thought. :D