You know, this is why the question of 'who tops' is so tricky. Because different people will have different definitions of what that means, even despite what may seem like a rather clear distinction. Because for me, "implied possible switching but Draco bottoms" sounds exactly right for that sort of situation, and just labelling it "bottom!Draco" doesn't quite capture it. But at the same time, it would be a lot harder to do any kind of statistical analysis if we allowed 17 different categories of topping and bottoming :) So giving it a simple label but then adding explanatory notes as well for anyone who cares is probably the way to go.
no subject
You know, this is why the question of 'who tops' is so tricky. Because different people will have different definitions of what that means, even despite what may seem like a rather clear distinction. Because for me, "implied possible switching but Draco bottoms" sounds exactly right for that sort of situation, and just labelling it "bottom!Draco" doesn't quite capture it. But at the same time, it would be a lot harder to do any kind of statistical analysis if we allowed 17 different categories of topping and bottoming :) So giving it a simple label but then adding explanatory notes as well for anyone who cares is probably the way to go.
Thanks again!