Who tops more, Draco or Harry?
Mar. 18th, 2015 01:32 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yesterday I was having a discussion with vaysh about who tops more in fanfic, Draco or Harry (link here). I was of the opinion that it seemed fairly balanced, but that was from my perspective of mostly reading recent fic. Vaysh has been reading Drarry fanfiction for much longer than me, however, and she disagreed:
"statistical evidence is very clear: There is in no way a 50:50 balance between top and bottom!Draco fanworks. For many people, bottom!Draco remains the default."
Aha, I thought, a statistical challenge! As it turns out, I have a database of Drarry fics which I can consult, so I am in position to offer an answer to this pressing question. There are nearly 1500 Drarry fics written between 2002 and 2015 for which I have information about who tops or bottoms, and according to this data, we're both right :)
- Who bottoms more across all fics in all years?
Answer: Draco, clearly (pointvaysh)
- Has the proportion of bottom!Draco to bottom!Harry begun to balance out more in recent years?
Answer: Yes, clearly (pointsnowgall)
Before I get to the fancy chart and graphs, let me explain a bit where my data comes from and how reliable and/or biased it could be.
My list of Drarry fics includes not just fics that I have personally read, but also every fic that capitu has ever recced, as well as every fic ever recced at
hd_storyroom, whether I've read them or not. Capitu (at
my_drarry_recs) helpfully includes tags indicating who bottoms in a fic (if applicable) so I have that data even for fics I haven't read. I have also included many (but not all) of the fics recced by
gracerene, who also includes top/bottom info. The chart below only contains data from fics where I could determine something about who tops or bottoms.
Of course, for fics not recced by capitu or hd-storyroom, which fics get listed in my database will be skewed by my own reading preferences. However, it's important to note that I personally don't care who tops or bottoms, so I don't think that I will have unintentionally skewed the data one way or the other.
The other big issue concerns the date a fic was published. The vast majority of the fics in my database are fics written since 2007, and precious few written before 2005. But I also should point out that if I can't accurately date a fic, then I'm not including it in this dataset. The earlier a fic was written, the harder it can be to find its pub date, so part of the reason there are so few pre-2005 fics is because I can't be sure when they were actually written.
Ok, enough caveats about the data, on to the chart! I hope it is self-explanatory, because I'm not going to waste more words explaining something you can see for yourself :) Just note that I'm including fics from 2015 too, even though we're only 3 months in.
Year | bottom!Draco | bottom!Harry | switching | no penetration | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 47 |
2014 | 70 | 70 | 26 | 85 | 251 |
2013 | 97 | 55 | 16 | 64 | 232 |
2012 | 67 | 57 | 8 | 29 | 161 |
2011 | 49 | 33 | 15 | 42 | 139 |
2010 | 54 | 36 | 12 | 32 | 134 |
2009 | 58 | 26 | 11 | 31 | 126 |
2008 | 75 | 32 | 7 | 20 | 134 |
2007 | 54 | 22 | 14 | 16 | 106 |
2006 | 27 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 57 |
2005 | 26 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 65 |
2004 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 |
2003 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
2002 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Overall | 606 | 368 | 140 | 376 | 1490 |
And now for some pretty pie charts:










As you can see, before 2010 bottom!Draco was much more common than bottom!Harry, but since then the proportion of bottom!Draco fics has gone down, to the point that of the works I've analyzed for 2014, there's a perfect balance between the two!
Is the influence of the dracotops_harry fest part of the reason for this change? It's possible. The DTH fest began in 2011, and my data seems to date the gradual shift to 2010.
It's also true that some of the disparity could be traced to a few big-name authors who tend(ed) to prefer one dynamic over another. Here's just a few examples I know of authors who seemed to prefer bottom!Draco but who haven't written as much in the last few years:
ladyvader, active approx 2003 - 2010
jennavere, active approx 2004 - 2006
pir8fancier, active approx 2004 - 2013
silentauror, active approx 2005 - 2009
There are many more bottom!Draco authors who are still actively writing HD, among them: enchanted_jae,
oldenuf2nb, and
samaelthekind.
But interestingly, I can only think of one long-time author who seems to prefer bottom!Harry: megyal.
(Edit: vaysh pointed out that
lomonaaeren is also a bottom!Harry author. My bad!)
If you have any insights into this data, disagree about my analysis, or can think of something I missed, please leave a comment!
Edit: Inspired by suggestions in the comments section, I have re-run the numbers using just data from the hd_fan_fair fests. See my write-up here. The data was collected through crowd-sourcing, and we are currently working on building a second crowd-sourced spreadsheet of data from
hd_smoochfest too!
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 06:38 am (UTC)I am 100% for switching, (well in long fics I will always have them switch) but funnily enough, I realised recently that I tend to write more bottom!Harry than bottom!Draco, even sometimes when Harry's a virgin and Draco's not. In any case, I let the story and the scene guide me through who's going to top/bottom. We all have our conscious and less conscious headcanons too, and that translates differently in fics.
Anyway, gotta run to work, but this is really interesting. And I love having facts like these, so, please continue! :)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 06:46 am (UTC)Thank you :3
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 07:44 am (UTC)One quick addition:
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 08:24 am (UTC)You did miss one thing, though. Draco topping Harry is really, really hot (although Harry topping Draco is also really hot... maybe we need a chart for hotness?) ;-)
My personal feeling was that more people are writing top!Draco than top!Harry these days. But that could just be because so many of my FAVOURITE writers write top!Draco.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:10 am (UTC)Thank you for putting it all together. <333
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:55 am (UTC)(09 & 10 are the other years of that fest, and 10 seems to be around the start of the numbers evening out. So I don't know! XD)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 10:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:38 pm (UTC)was a lurkerfirst got into fandom (around 2004, maybe?). Perhaps this could have been discouraging for the top!Draco writers? But yes, then DTH came along and fixed that -- interestingly enough, it's one of the few fests that keep on bringing new writers to the fandom every year :) Or at least they're new to me!I'm not so sure about readers though. I'll admit I'm one of those writers skewed towards bottom!Draco (not in my reading habits, but definitely in my writing ones), and every one of my stories featuring intercourse got at least one comment/email/PM telling me how 'while it works perfectly in this story, I really prefer to read Draco topping'. So, you know. It's perhaps a thing? :)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:57 pm (UTC)I think DTH is a fest that caters to a slightly different crowd than the usual H/D shipper. Quite a few of the writers and also the community members don't otherwise engage in H/D fandom. I am not quite sure why that is, but yes, I love that out of every DTH fest so far, some new writers have emerged.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:07 pm (UTC)And your impression was my impression too, until
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:10 pm (UTC)