Who tops more, Draco or Harry?
Mar. 18th, 2015 01:32 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yesterday I was having a discussion with vaysh about who tops more in fanfic, Draco or Harry (link here). I was of the opinion that it seemed fairly balanced, but that was from my perspective of mostly reading recent fic. Vaysh has been reading Drarry fanfiction for much longer than me, however, and she disagreed:
"statistical evidence is very clear: There is in no way a 50:50 balance between top and bottom!Draco fanworks. For many people, bottom!Draco remains the default."
Aha, I thought, a statistical challenge! As it turns out, I have a database of Drarry fics which I can consult, so I am in position to offer an answer to this pressing question. There are nearly 1500 Drarry fics written between 2002 and 2015 for which I have information about who tops or bottoms, and according to this data, we're both right :)
- Who bottoms more across all fics in all years?
Answer: Draco, clearly (pointvaysh)
- Has the proportion of bottom!Draco to bottom!Harry begun to balance out more in recent years?
Answer: Yes, clearly (pointsnowgall)
Before I get to the fancy chart and graphs, let me explain a bit where my data comes from and how reliable and/or biased it could be.
My list of Drarry fics includes not just fics that I have personally read, but also every fic that capitu has ever recced, as well as every fic ever recced at
hd_storyroom, whether I've read them or not. Capitu (at
my_drarry_recs) helpfully includes tags indicating who bottoms in a fic (if applicable) so I have that data even for fics I haven't read. I have also included many (but not all) of the fics recced by
gracerene, who also includes top/bottom info. The chart below only contains data from fics where I could determine something about who tops or bottoms.
Of course, for fics not recced by capitu or hd-storyroom, which fics get listed in my database will be skewed by my own reading preferences. However, it's important to note that I personally don't care who tops or bottoms, so I don't think that I will have unintentionally skewed the data one way or the other.
The other big issue concerns the date a fic was published. The vast majority of the fics in my database are fics written since 2007, and precious few written before 2005. But I also should point out that if I can't accurately date a fic, then I'm not including it in this dataset. The earlier a fic was written, the harder it can be to find its pub date, so part of the reason there are so few pre-2005 fics is because I can't be sure when they were actually written.
Ok, enough caveats about the data, on to the chart! I hope it is self-explanatory, because I'm not going to waste more words explaining something you can see for yourself :) Just note that I'm including fics from 2015 too, even though we're only 3 months in.
Year | bottom!Draco | bottom!Harry | switching | no penetration | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 47 |
2014 | 70 | 70 | 26 | 85 | 251 |
2013 | 97 | 55 | 16 | 64 | 232 |
2012 | 67 | 57 | 8 | 29 | 161 |
2011 | 49 | 33 | 15 | 42 | 139 |
2010 | 54 | 36 | 12 | 32 | 134 |
2009 | 58 | 26 | 11 | 31 | 126 |
2008 | 75 | 32 | 7 | 20 | 134 |
2007 | 54 | 22 | 14 | 16 | 106 |
2006 | 27 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 57 |
2005 | 26 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 65 |
2004 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 |
2003 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
2002 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Overall | 606 | 368 | 140 | 376 | 1490 |
And now for some pretty pie charts:










As you can see, before 2010 bottom!Draco was much more common than bottom!Harry, but since then the proportion of bottom!Draco fics has gone down, to the point that of the works I've analyzed for 2014, there's a perfect balance between the two!
Is the influence of the dracotops_harry fest part of the reason for this change? It's possible. The DTH fest began in 2011, and my data seems to date the gradual shift to 2010.
It's also true that some of the disparity could be traced to a few big-name authors who tend(ed) to prefer one dynamic over another. Here's just a few examples I know of authors who seemed to prefer bottom!Draco but who haven't written as much in the last few years:
ladyvader, active approx 2003 - 2010
jennavere, active approx 2004 - 2006
pir8fancier, active approx 2004 - 2013
silentauror, active approx 2005 - 2009
There are many more bottom!Draco authors who are still actively writing HD, among them: enchanted_jae,
oldenuf2nb, and
samaelthekind.
But interestingly, I can only think of one long-time author who seems to prefer bottom!Harry: megyal.
(Edit: vaysh pointed out that
lomonaaeren is also a bottom!Harry author. My bad!)
If you have any insights into this data, disagree about my analysis, or can think of something I missed, please leave a comment!
Edit: Inspired by suggestions in the comments section, I have re-run the numbers using just data from the hd_fan_fair fests. See my write-up here. The data was collected through crowd-sourcing, and we are currently working on building a second crowd-sourced spreadsheet of data from
hd_smoochfest too!
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 06:38 am (UTC)I am 100% for switching, (well in long fics I will always have them switch) but funnily enough, I realised recently that I tend to write more bottom!Harry than bottom!Draco, even sometimes when Harry's a virgin and Draco's not. In any case, I let the story and the scene guide me through who's going to top/bottom. We all have our conscious and less conscious headcanons too, and that translates differently in fics.
Anyway, gotta run to work, but this is really interesting. And I love having facts like these, so, please continue! :)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-19 04:52 am (UTC)THIS. So much!!!
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 06:46 am (UTC)Thank you :3
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 07:44 am (UTC)One quick addition:
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 08:24 am (UTC)You did miss one thing, though. Draco topping Harry is really, really hot (although Harry topping Draco is also really hot... maybe we need a chart for hotness?) ;-)
My personal feeling was that more people are writing top!Draco than top!Harry these days. But that could just be because so many of my FAVOURITE writers write top!Draco.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:07 pm (UTC)And your impression was my impression too, until
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:10 am (UTC)Thank you for putting it all together. <333
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 09:55 am (UTC)(09 & 10 are the other years of that fest, and 10 seems to be around the start of the numbers evening out. So I don't know! XD)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:13 pm (UTC)It's unfortunate that my list is idiosyncratic to me - I wish there was a way to search AO3 for this info, but while some authors will tag for top/bottom, there's still the whole "dating the fic" issue which I ranted about already. So I have to use my data to be sure, and there's always the chance it could be skewed. But your idea makes a lot of sense, so I'll look for that!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:38 pm (UTC)was a lurkerfirst got into fandom (around 2004, maybe?). Perhaps this could have been discouraging for the top!Draco writers? But yes, then DTH came along and fixed that -- interestingly enough, it's one of the few fests that keep on bringing new writers to the fandom every year :) Or at least they're new to me!I'm not so sure about readers though. I'll admit I'm one of those writers skewed towards bottom!Draco (not in my reading habits, but definitely in my writing ones), and every one of my stories featuring intercourse got at least one comment/email/PM telling me how 'while it works perfectly in this story, I really prefer to read Draco topping'. So, you know. It's perhaps a thing? :)
no subject
Date: 2015-03-18 12:57 pm (UTC)I think DTH is a fest that caters to a slightly different crowd than the usual H/D shipper. Quite a few of the writers and also the community members don't otherwise engage in H/D fandom. I am not quite sure why that is, but yes, I love that out of every DTH fest so far, some new writers have emerged.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Bottom!Draco
Date: 2015-03-18 09:47 pm (UTC)Re: Bottom!Draco
Date: 2015-03-18 09:56 pm (UTC)And thanks also for your perspective on why you like to write bottom!Draco. It's really interesting to hear from someone with experience. ♥
Re: Bottom!Draco
From:Wednesday 18th March, 2015.
Date: 2015-03-18 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-19 03:43 am (UTC)- What is the influence of sampling from rec lists? You, capitu, and gracerene are all very well read, and I would wager more broadly read than many, and all read both top!Harry and top!Draco, so - as you say - I don't expect that your own preferences, as such, influences the data pool. But there are many fic writers out there who don't get recced (or read, or kudo'd - there's a tumblr post out there that's escaping me atm that shows that either a plurality or majority of fics have <5 kudos and very few hits). Is it safe to assume that what ends up on rec lists is reflective of what doesn't?
- Relatedly, is the sample as large as it would seem to be? Your spreadsheet of capitu's rec list shows 1293 stories, but those are from only ("only") 444 unique authors, who may (or may not) have patterns in their writing that are less statistically significant than those of the very prolific writers you mention, but may still have some impact, especially if there's any sort of effect in the aggregate.
- Is there a bias in which older fics were preserved and/or are still read? Are people who are reading and reccing now able to capture the zeitgeist of the community as it was then, since it included many works that are no longer readily accessible?
- Would the results be different if based on a ratio instead of a percentage? As in, comparing the number of top!Harry to number of bottom!Harry stories, and number of top!Draco to bottom!Draco stories? A quick search of AO3 tags (which are not a good sample - tiny, inconsistently applied, not sorted by year - but is what's available quickly rn) shows that the ratio of top!harry to bottom harry is 1:1.2, but the ratio of top!draco to bottom!draco is 1:2.
- Because there's potential for unknown sources of bias, random sampling is generally the safest bet, but is that meaningfully possible in a community that's spread over multiple platforms?
- Is the shift over time reflective of more top!draco, or of more non-penetrative sexual activity? Is Draco topping more, or is topping increasingly irrelevant b/c of a shift towards frottage, wanking, oral, etc.?
no subject
Date: 2015-03-19 05:19 am (UTC)1) You're right that many many authors and fics don't get read a lot, and sampling from rec lists will probably be biased towards already popular fics. But! Kudos on AO3 are not always a good meter of popularity, especially for older fics. (The example I always trot out here is
Still, 216 kudos ain't nothing :) Not like the <5 you mentioned.
So I went and looked at my data again to see if I could give you some more info. Of the 1490 fics I looked at, 911 are available on AO3 (that I know of). As it turns out, I made a note of how many kudos each of those fics had on AO3 at the time I read it or added it to my database. For really popular fics, this number will change dramatically over time. But for less popular fics that have been on AO3 for a while, their kudo numbers stay pretty stable. If we ignore fics published in 2015 (because their kudo numbers will still be highly changeable) I now have 880 fics on AO3 that I can say something about.
Of those, I have 3 fics recced by capitu on my list which have less than 5 kudos on AO3 as of today:
archiveofourown.org/works/1950570 (4 kudos, bottom!Draco)
archiveofourown.org/works/1157336 (5 kudos, bottom!Harry)
archiveofourown.org/works/0301315 (5 kudos, switching)
If you go as high as 20 kudos, I've got lots more fics on my list (and even a few more with <5 that weren't recced by capitu but that I added myself because they struck my fancy)
So while I absolutely agree with you that my list is not going to contain that many unpopular fics, it still may be true that I have a representative sample anyway. And it's also not always clear how to (objectively) determine how popular a fic is anyway.
I know that's not a complete answer, and you asked many more things, but I'll post this part and answer more of your questions subsequently :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-03-19 11:06 am (UTC)From this position, I'd say that I would have assumed there would be more bottom!Draco over all but that yes, things are evening out. Not equal, no, but not as lopsided. I think the fact that there *is* a Draco Tops Harry fest should tell you, though, that there was a market for something that wasn't the norm. Meaning if there was a Harry Tops Draco fest, wouldn't people find that unnecessary? Maybe there will come a day when the pendulum swings far enough that's the case, but as the stats seem to indicate, top!Harry is still the majority.
Bringing a bit of insight from Severus/Harry, where I do spend my time, there is a bottom!Snape community precisely because he usually tops. People interested in bottom!Harry don't have to do anything to find it. And, unlike H/D, I think that's still the norm. Perhaps because of the age difference (and common assumption that older=top).
tl;dr ramble LOL Thanks for the interesting stats!
no subject
Date: 2015-03-19 02:49 pm (UTC)Assumptions about who should top or bottom based on canon characteristics always make me laugh, though, because canonically they're both straight! I mean, I like my fanfic characters to be depicted as close to canon as possible, but I don't pretend that this says anything definitive about who would top :) And I'd imagine that if someone liked to bottom, that wouldn't necessarily change as they got older!
(This is not a complaint against you at all; I know you were just speculating on what other people may be thinking. I'm just musing aloud and rambling too :)
Oh, and there is a bottom-draco fest, although it's not HD specific.
H/D Fan Fair: top!Draco and bottom!Draco save-lists over the years
Date: 2015-03-20 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-21 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-21 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-22 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-22 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-12 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-12 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-05-18 03:40 pm (UTC)Thanks so much for sharing!
no subject
Date: 2015-05-19 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-06-30 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-01 04:37 pm (UTC)